Java Developers in the US

About Java Developers

Hire senior engineers for Java and Spring Boot backends: REST and gRPC APIs, microservices, batch jobs, and integrations with the systems you already run. You work directly with the developers on flat quotes, with a written scope, automated tests, and CI on every build. Choose one dedicated developer or a small product team, on a monthly rolling contract with no lock-in.

What the engagement includes

• Senior engineers only. You work directly with the person writing the code, never an account-manager layer or an offshore handoff.
• The backend fundamentals transfer directly: REST and gRPC API design, relational and NoSQL data modeling on PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB, Redis caching, and AWS deployment are the same disciplines whether the runtime is the JVM or Node.
• A written scope before any code is written, so both sides agree on what done means and what it costs.
• Automated tests (JUnit, Testcontainers, integration tests) and CI on every build, not tests bolted on at the end to tick a box.
• You own the GitHub repo, the cloud account, and the CI pipeline from day one, so there is a clean handover or exit whenever you want it.
• Flat INR quotes with GST for Indian clients, and USD, CAD, GBP, or AED via Wise for overseas teams. W-8BEN and LUT on file, 24-hour response.

IRS Publication 1075, DHS's foreign-national clause and the Medicaid offshore payment rule for US Java teams

Some American Java estates are closed to an offshore developer by rule, and the clearest case is any system that touches federal tax information. State revenue departments, child support enforcement agencies and the human services agencies that verify benefit eligibility receive return information from the IRS, and Publication 1075, the IRS's safeguarding rulebook for them, is blunt. Its section on offshore operations says FTI cannot be accessed by agency employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors located outside the United States, its territories, embassies or military installations, that it cannot be received, processed, stored, accessed or transmitted on systems located offshore, and that systems containing it must be located, operated and maintained by personnel physically within the United States, which rules out foreign remote maintenance and help desks. The acquisition control goes further than access. Where a contract developer is used, the agency must document through the contract that all FTI systems, beyond commercial products used as components, are located in the United States and are developed physically within the United States by US citizens or those with lawful resident status. That is a rule about where the code for the system is written, so synthetic test data does not open the door. The surrounding process adds its own steps: disclosure to a contractor needs notice to the IRS Office of Safeguards at least 45 days ahead, and using live FTI in a test environment needs an approved data testing request. So the honest answer from a team in India is that we do not work on an FTI system at all. What remains possible is work on separate systems outside the FTI boundary, such as a public portal that never receives return information, and only once your safeguards officer has drawn that boundary in writing. Where the line sits for your agency is for your disclosure officer and the IRS.

Federal work for the Department of Homeland Security carries a contract clause that settles the same question before anyone writes a line. HSAR 3052.204-71, Contractor Employee Access, in its July 2023 version, requires a favorably adjudicated background investigation before contractor staff who need recurring access to government facilities, CUI or information resources start work, unless that is waived under departmental procedures. Its Alternate I, used when the contract involves access to information resources, adds that non-US citizens shall not be authorized to access or assist in the development, operation, management or maintenance of Department IT systems under the contract, unless the Head of the Component or a designee grants a waiver with the concurrence of both the Department's Chief Security Officer and Chief Information Officer. A waiver needs a compelling reason for using that individual instead of a US citizen and has to be in the government's best interest, proposals must name every non-US citizen proposed to work under the contract along with their citizenship, and additions or deletions after award are reported to the contracting officer. The clause flows down to subcontracts at any tier where the subcontractor may have access to government facilities, CUI or information resources, so a prime contractor cannot route the work to a team abroad and leave the clause behind. For a Java shop bidding on a DHS component's case management or data platform, that turns an offshore team into a proposal-stage decision with named individuals and a waiver request attached, not a staffing detail sorted out after award. If no waiver is sought, the development stays with US citizens, and an offshore partner's role is limited to work that falls outside the contract's IT systems entirely. Whether your contract carries Alternate I, and whether a waiver is realistic for your component, is for your contracting officer.

Medicaid shows that federal law is not uniformly against offshore work, and that the line can fall somewhere a Java claims engine has to enforce. Section 6505 of the Affordable Care Act added a requirement to section 1902(a) of the Social Security Act that a state make no payments for items or services under its Medicaid plan or a waiver to any financial institution or entity located outside the United States. CMS's letter to state Medicaid directors of 30 December 2010 drew the boundary precisely. Payments for tasks that support administration of the plan are not prohibited, and the letter gives outsourcing information processing related to plan administration and call centers for enrollment or claims adjudication as examples. Payments for plan services are prohibited where they go to provider bank accounts or business agents outside the United States and its territories, to telemedicine providers located outside them, or to pharmacies located outside them. The letter told states this may require changes to the Medicaid Management Information System, such as an edit or flag that denies provider claims directed to be paid to a financial institution or entity outside the United States, and that payments made in error must be recovered with the federal share returned to CMS. In a Java MMIS that becomes concrete: the provider enrollment record carries a payee institution and address that are validated rather than free text, the claims pipeline applies a deterministic edit before payment rather than producing a report afterwards, and the territories the statute counts as part of the United States, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa, sit in the reference data so they are not rejected by mistake. A state's own contract can be stricter than this federal floor, so its data location and staffing clauses are read first. What your state's contract permits is for its procurement office and your own counsel.

How we work with US clients

A US engagement gets agreed twice. Once with the person who wants the thing built, and then again with legal, security, procurement and finance, who arrive separately and rarely in the same week. That second round is where a supplier outside the country loses the calendar: a master services agreement to redline, a security questionnaire, a certificate of insurance, and a vendor portal that assumes everyone it onboards can sign a W-9. Send all of it while the scope is still being written rather than in the week you wanted to start, and where the honest answer to a row is that we do not hold something, we write that in rather than leaving it blank.

You are also buying from a company you cannot drop in on, so the evidence has to do the work an office would otherwise do. What we send is live production URLs rather than a deck, a written scope with one fixed number against it, and the names of the people who will do the work rather than a bench that changes after signature. What we will also tell you is the shape of what you are hiring: a small team in Noida that has been building since 2021, not a firm that can put four more people on your project next Monday. If that is what your timeline needs, we say so before the contract rather than after it.

Questions US clients ask

Java Developers: common questions

Other markets we work in